Skip to main content

The AHRQ National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC, qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov) Web site will not be available after July 16, 2018 because federal funding
through AHRQ will no longer be available to support the NQMC as of that date. For additional information, read our full announcement.
  • Measure Summary
  • NQMC:003505
  • Jan 2007

Bipolar disorder: the percentage of patients with bipolar disorder who receive a recommendation for an adjunctive psychosocial intervention, including evidence-based therapies, within 12 weeks of initiating treatment.

STABLE (STAndards for BipoLar Excellence) performance measures. Boston (MA): Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health; 2007. various p.

View the original measure documentation External Web Site Policy

This is the current release of the measure.

The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in September 2015.

Primary Measure Domain

Clinical Quality Measures: Process

Secondary Measure Domain

Does not apply to this measure

Description

This measure is used to assess the percentage of patients with bipolar disorder who receive a recommendation for an adjunctive psychosocial intervention, including evidence-based therapies, within 12 weeks of initiating treatment.

Rationale

The Role of Psychosocial Interventions

  • Psychotherapy is a critical component of bipolar disorder treatment in addition to pharmacotherapy.
  • Evidence-based psychosocial interventions have been found to improve treatment adherence, reduce likelihood of recurrence and extend time to new episodes.
  • Initially focusing on issues relating to medication adherence, psychosocial strategies are now recommended to include broader strategies to promote mood stability, address comorbid conditions, improve understanding in support of treatment adherence, recognition of relapse and collaborative self-management.
  • Interventions that support return to role functioning and that address stressors and interpersonal communications are considered beneficial for remission and recovery.

Types of Psychosocial Interventions

  • Evidence-based: family-focused therapy (FFT), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), formal psychoeducation, and interpersonal therapy (IPT) with or without a social rhythm component (IPSRT) have been supported through well developed clinical trials and are incorporated into guideline recommendations.
  • Brief supportive and group psychotherapy are also suggested, as alternative strategies.

Evidence for Rationale

Colom F, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A, Reinares M, Goikolea JM, Benabarre A, Torrent C, Comes M, Corbella B, Parramon G, Corominas J. A randomized trial on the efficacy of group psychoeducation in the prophylaxis of recurrences in bipolar patients whose disease is in remission. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;60(4):402-7. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Colom F, Vieta E, Reinares M, Martinez-Aran A, Torrent C, Goikolea JM, Gasto C. Psychoeducation efficacy in bipolar disorders: beyond compliance enhancement. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;64(9):1101-5. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Thase ME, Mallinger AG, Swartz HA, Fagiolini AM, Grochocinski V, Houck P, Scott J, Thompson W, Monk T. Two-year outcomes for interpersonal and social rhythm therapy in individuals with bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):996-1004. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Guideline watch: practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. 2nd ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2006. 9 p.

Keck PE, Perlis R, Otto M, Carpenter D, Ross R, Docherty J. Treatment of bipolar disorder 2004. In: Expert consensus guideline series, postgraduate medicine - a special report. 2004 Dec.

Lam DH, Watkins ER, Hayward P, Bright J, Wright K, Kerr N, Parr-Davis G, Sham P. A randomized controlled study of cognitive therapy for relapse prevention for bipolar affective disorder: outcome of the first year. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):145-52. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Miklowitz DJ, George EL, Richards JA, Simoneau TL, Suddath RL. A randomized study of family-focused psychoeducation and pharmacotherapy in the outpatient management of bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;60(9):904-12. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder (revision). Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;159(4 Suppl):1-50. [472 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Vieta E, Pacchiarotti I, Scott J, Sanchez-Moreno J, Di Marzo S, Colom F. Evidence-based research on the efficacy of psychologic interventions in bipolar disorders: a critical review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2005 Dec;7(6):449-55. [50 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, O'Donovan C, Parikh S, MacQueen G, McIntyre R, Sharma V, Silverstone P, Alda M, Baruch P, Beaulieu S, Daigneault A, Milev R, Young LT, Ravindran A, Schaffer A, Connolly M, Gorman CP. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: consensus and controversies. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7 Suppl 3:5-69. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Primary Health Components

Bipolar disorder; psychosocial intervention

Denominator Description

Patients diagnosed and treated for bipolar disorder (see the related "Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions" field)

Numerator Description

Patients with a recommendation for psychosocial intervention within 12 weeks of initiating treatment (see the related "Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions" field)

Type of Evidence Supporting the Criterion of Quality for the Measure

  • A clinical practice guideline or other peer-reviewed synthesis of the clinical research evidence
  • A formal consensus procedure, involving experts in relevant clinical, methodological, public health and organizational sciences
  • One or more research studies published in a National Library of Medicine (NLM) indexed, peer-reviewed journal

Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure

Unspecified

Extent of Measure Testing

  • The STABLE measures were developed using the RAND Appropriateness Method and have been shown to have content validity and face validity.
  • Data feasibility testing was performed to determine the availability of the data elements required in the measure numerator and denominator specifications.
  • Inter-abstractor reliability testing was performed to assess the data collection strategy. The data collection strategy included data collection forms; data dictionary references and abstractor instructions.
  • A field study was conducted to determine measure conformance in an appropriate convenience sample.

Refer to the references listed below for further information.

Evidence for Extent of Measure Testing

STABLE performance measures: data feasibility testing & results. Boston (MA): Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health; 2007. 2 p.

STABLE performance measures: development process & validity ratings. Boston (MA): Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health; 2007. 3 p.

STABLE performance measures: field study process & conformance findings. Boston (MA): Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health; 2007. 3 p.

STABLE performance measures: inter-abstractor reliability testing & results. Boston (MA): Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health; 2007. 2 p.

State of Use

Current routine use

Current Use

Internal quality improvement

Measurement Setting

Ambulatory/Office-based Care

Behavioral Health Care

Professionals Involved in Delivery of Health Services

Advanced Practice Nurses

Physicians

Psychologists/Non-physician Behavioral Health Clinicians

Least Aggregated Level of Services Delivery Addressed

Individual Clinicians or Public Health Professionals

Statement of Acceptable Minimum Sample Size

Unspecified

Target Population Age

Age greater than or equal to 18 years

Target Population Gender

Either male or female

National Quality Strategy Aim

Better Care

National Quality Strategy Priority

Prevention and Treatment of Leading Causes of Mortality

IOM Care Need

Getting Better

Living with Illness

IOM Domain

Effectiveness

Case Finding Period

Unspecified

Denominator Sampling Frame

Patients associated with provider

Denominator (Index) Event or Characteristic

Clinical Condition

Diagnostic Evaluation

Encounter

Patient/Individual (Consumer) Characteristic

Therapeutic Intervention

Denominator Time Window

Does not apply to this measure

Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions

Inclusions
Patients 18 years of age or older with an initial or new episode of bipolar disorder

AND

Documentation of a diagnosis involving bipolar disorder; to include at least one of the following:

  • Codes 296.0x; 296.1x; 296.4x; 296.5x; 296.6x; 296.7; 296.80; 296.81; 296.82; 296.89; 301.13 documented in body of chart, such as a pre-printed form completed by a clinician and/or codes documented in chart notes/forms
  • Diagnosis or impression documented in chart indicating bipolar disorder
  • Use of a screening/assessment tool for bipolar disorder with a score or conclusion that patient has bipolar disorder and documentation that this information is used to establish or substantiate the diagnosis

AND

Documentation of treatment for bipolar disorder with relevant pharmacotherapy; a mood stabilizing agent and/or an antipsychotic agent

Exclusions
Documentation that psychosocial interventions are (1) not indicated or (2) patients refuses to consider/discuss, or (3) source of referral for psychosocial practice not available in community.

Exclusions/Exceptions

Unspecified

Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions

Inclusions
Documentation that adjunctive psycho-social intervention(s) were recommended (Refer to the "Data Dictionary Reference" in the original measure documentation for specified psychosocial interventions.). Recommendation may include the following:

  • Interventions provided at practice site
  • Referral to psychologist/therapist or psychiatrist outside of practice site for psychosocial services
  • Referral to a mental health clinic or hospital-based outpatient (OP) program for psychosocial services
  • Referral to a support/advocacy provided community-based program for psychosocial services

AND

Timeframe:
Documentation of recommendation for adjunctive psychosocial intervention(s) should occur within 12 weeks of initiating treatment for bipolar disorder.

Exclusions
Unspecified

Numerator Search Strategy

Fixed time period or point in time

Data Source

Administrative clinical data

Paper medical record

Type of Health State

Does not apply to this measure

Instruments Used and/or Associated with the Measure

Unspecified

Measure Specifies Disaggregation

Does not apply to this measure

Scoring

Rate/Proportion

Interpretation of Score

Desired value is a higher score

Allowance for Patient or Population Factors

Unspecified

Standard of Comparison

Internal time comparison

Original Title

Bipolar disorder: recommending adjunctive psychosocial interventions.

Measure Collection Name

Standards for Bipolar Excellence (STABLE) Performance Measures

Submitter

Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health - Clinical Specialty Collaboration

Developer

STABLE Project National Coordinating Council - Clinical Specialty Collaboration

Funding Source(s)

AstraZeneca LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, provided financial sponsorship for the STABLE Project. They did not otherwise participate in the development of either the measures or toolkit.

Composition of the Group that Developed the Measure

The STABLE National Coordinating Council (NCC) External Web Site Policy was comprised of national experts in bipolar disorder, psychiatry, primary care, and performance improvement. The NCC guided and directed the STABLE Project. NCC members agreed to serve with the understanding that the STABLE Performance Measures and Resource Toolkit would be fully transparent and available without cost in the public domain.

EPI-Q, Inc. External Web Site Policy, is a consulting company providing practice-based outcomes research, pharmacoeconomic studies, and quality improvement services. EPI-Q managed the STABLE Project.

Financial Disclosures/Other Potential Conflicts of Interest

Unspecified

Adaptation

This measure was not adapted from another source.

Date of Most Current Version in NQMC

2007 Jan

Measure Maintenance

Unspecified

Date of Next Anticipated Revision

Unspecified

Measure Status

This is the current release of the measure.

The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in September 2015.

Source(s)

STABLE (STAndards for BipoLar Excellence) performance measures. Boston (MA): Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health; 2007. various p.

Measure Availability

Source available from the Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Mental Health (CQAIMH) Web site External Web Site Policy.

For more information, contact CQAIMH at E-mail: cqaimh@cqaimh.org; Web site: cqaimh.org/index.html External Web Site Policy.

Companion Documents

The following is available:

NQMC Status

This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on January 10, 2008. The information was verified by the measure developer on April 14, 2008.

This NQMC summary was retrofitted into the new template on June 27, 2011.

The information was reaffirmed by the measure developer on September 30, 2015.

Copyright Statement

The STABLE materials published on this Web site are copyrighted by CQAIMH. They may be used for research, teaching, and quality measurement/improvement activities – provided the following:

  • The materials are not sold, distributed or licensed for commercial purposes.
  • CQAIMH's copyright is acknowledged in reproductions of these materials.
  • Modifications to the materials are not made without CQAIMH's permission.

NQMC Disclaimer

The National Quality Measures Clearinghouse™ (NQMC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the measures represented on this site.

All measures summarized by NQMC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public and private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, individuals, and similar entities.

Measures represented on the NQMC Web site are submitted by measure developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NQMC Inclusion Criteria.

NQMC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or its reliability and/or validity of the quality measures and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of measures represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NQMC, AHRQ, or its contractor, ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of measures in NQMC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding measure content are directed to contact the measure developer.

About NQMC Measure Summaries

NQMC provides structured summaries containing information about measures and their development.

Measure Summary FAQs


Measure Summaries

New This Week

View more and sign up for our Newsletter

Get Adobe Reader