Skip to main content

The AHRQ National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC, qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov) Web site will not be available after July 16, 2018 because federal funding
through AHRQ will no longer be available to support the NQMC as of that date. For additional information, read our full announcement.
  • Measure Summary
  • NQMC:009377
  • Jan 2015

Total knee replacement: percentage of patients undergoing total knee replacement whose operative report identifies the prosthetic implant specifications including the prosthetic implant manufacturer, the brand name of the prosthetic implant, and the size of each prosthetic implant.

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Total knee replacement performance measurement set. Rosemont (IL): American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; 2015. 29 p. [25 references]

View the original measure documentation External Web Site Policy

This is the current release of the measure.

The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in October 2015.

Primary Measure Domain

Clinical Quality Measures: Process

Secondary Measure Domain

Does not apply to this measure

Description

This measure is used to assess the percentage of patients undergoing total knee replacement whose operative report identifies the prosthetic implant specifications including the prosthetic implant manufacturer, the brand name of the prosthetic implant, and the size of each prosthetic implant.

Rationale

It is important to capture the type of prosthesis used. The rates of prosthesis failure which will require a revision increases from 10 percent at 10 years to approximately 20 percent at 20 years following surgery (National Institutes of Health, 2003). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires appropriate tracking of the device but this information may not be readily available to the surgeon performing the revision. The surgeon performing the revision needs to be able to identify the prosthesis and size of the prosthesis that were used in the initial surgery, to determine if a complete revision is required or if a partial revision could be performed. The initial operative report should contain the necessary information which will ultimately help the future treating physician who performs the revision surgery.

The SooHoo et al. study used a quality indicator that included 4 elements that should be documented in an operative note. The elements included knee stability, range of motion, patellar tracking, and the implants used in the procedure. The variation between the 3 hospitals where the total knee replacement operative notes included the 4 important elements, ranged from 26 to 59 percent (SooHoo et al., 2011).

The following evidence statements are quoted verbatim from the referenced clinical guidelines:

Effective tracking of devices from the manufacturing facility, through the distributor network (including distributors, retailers, rental firms and other commercial enterprises, device user facilities, and licensed practitioners) and ultimately, to the patient is necessary for the effectiveness of remedies prescribed by the act, such as patient notification (section 518 [a] of the act) or device recall (section 518 [e] of the act) (Federal Register, 2008).

Evidence for Rationale

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Total knee replacement performance measurement set. Rosemont (IL): American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; 2013 Jan. 29 p. [25 references]

Federal Register. Medical Device Tracking Requirements. 21:821. 2008.

SooHoo NF, Tang EY, Krenek L, Eagan M, McGlynn E. Variations in the quality of care delivered to patients undergoing total knee replacement at 3 affiliated hospitals. Orthopedics. 2011 May;34(5):e43-9.

Primary Health Components

Total knee replacement; operative report; prosthetic implant specifications

Denominator Description

All patients undergoing a total knee replacement (see the related "Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions" field)

Numerator Description

Patients whose operative report identifies the prosthetic implant specifications including the prosthetic implant manufacturer, the brand name of the prosthetic implant, and the size of each prosthetic implant

Type of Evidence Supporting the Criterion of Quality for the Measure

  • A formal consensus procedure, involving experts in relevant clinical, methodological, public health and organizational sciences
  • One or more research studies published in a National Library of Medicine (NLM) indexed, peer-reviewed journal

Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure

High Impact Topic Area
During 1991 to 2010, the rate of primary total knee replacement procedures among the Medicare population increased over 161 percent from 93,230 procedures in 1991 to 243,802 procedures in 2010. The rate of revision procedures increased over 105 percent from 9,650 to 19,871 procedures. The majority of the primary total knee replacements were performed on women (approximately 65 percent) (Cram et al., 2012).

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that the overall total knee replacement rate increased 58% (from 5.5 to 8.7 per 1,000 population) between 2000 and 2006. Similar increases were observed by sex, age group, and black or white race. Total knee replacement rates were 37 percent lower among blacks than whites (3.6 versus 5.7 per 1,000 population) in 2000, and 39% lower in 2006 (5.6 versus 9.2). In both years, the black/white disparity was lower among women (23% and 28%) than among men (63% and 60%). In 2006, blacks had a lower total knee replacement procedures among the Medicare population increased over 161 percent from 93,230 procedures in 1991 to 243,802 procedures rate than whites in all 50 states and the District of Columbia (CDC, 2009).

In 2004 there were over 450,000 total knee replacements performed in the United States (American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons [AAOS], 2008).

Between 2007 and 2009, over 22 percent of adults reported they had been diagnosed with arthritis (CDC, 2010). As the population ages, there will be an increased growth in the number of procedures. It is estimated that the number of total knee replacements performed per year could be over 3 million by the year 2030 (Kurtz et al., 2007).

Costs
Medicare paid approximately $3.2 billion in 2000 for hip and knee joint replacements (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003).

The overall inpatient costs for replacement of the knee during 2007 was over $9.2 billion with hospital stays of more than 605,000 (Stranges, Russo, & Friedman, 2009).

Evidence for Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Total knee replacement: summary. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003 Dec. 8 p. (Evidence report/technology assessment; no. 86).  [100 references]

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. 2nd ed. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2008.

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Total knee replacement performance measurement set. Rosemont (IL): American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; 2013 Jan. 29 p. [25 references]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation --- United States, 2007-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Oct 8;59(39):1261-5. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Racial disparities in total knee replacement among Medicare enrollees--United States, 2000-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Feb 20;58(6):133-8. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1227-36. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. PubMed External Web Site Policy

Stranges E, Russo A, Friedman B. Procedures with the most rapidly increasing hospital costs, 2004-2007. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009 Dec. 9 p. (H-CUP Statistical Brief; no. 82). 

Extent of Measure Testing

Unspecified

State of Use

Current routine use

Current Use

Internal quality improvement

Pay-for-reporting

Public reporting

Measurement Setting

Hospital Inpatient

Hospital Outpatient

Professionals Involved in Delivery of Health Services

Physicians

Least Aggregated Level of Services Delivery Addressed

Individual Clinicians or Public Health Professionals

Statement of Acceptable Minimum Sample Size

Does not apply to this measure

Target Population Age

Unspecified

Target Population Gender

Either male or female

National Quality Strategy Aim

Better Care

National Quality Strategy Priority

Making Care Safer
Making Quality Care More Affordable
Prevention and Treatment of Leading Causes of Mortality

IOM Care Need

Getting Better

Living with Illness

IOM Domain

Effectiveness

Efficiency

Safety

Case Finding Period

Unspecified

Denominator Sampling Frame

Patients associated with provider

Denominator (Index) Event or Characteristic

Therapeutic Intervention

Denominator Time Window

Does not apply to this measure

Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions

Inclusions
All patients undergoing a total knee replacement

Note: Refer to the original measure documentation for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.

Exclusions
None

Exclusions/Exceptions

None

Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions

Inclusions
Patients whose operative report identifies the prosthetic implant specifications including the prosthetic implant manufacturer, the brand name of the prosthetic implant, and the size of each prosthetic implant

Exclusions
None

Numerator Search Strategy

Fixed time period or point in time

Data Source

Administrative clinical data

Electronic health/medical record

Paper medical record

Registry data

Type of Health State

Does not apply to this measure

Instruments Used and/or Associated with the Measure

Unspecified

Measure Specifies Disaggregation

Does not apply to this measure

Scoring

Rate/Proportion

Interpretation of Score

Desired value is a higher score

Allowance for Patient or Population Factors

Unspecified

Standard of Comparison

Internal time comparison

Original Title

Measure #5: identification of implanted prosthesis in operative report.

Measure Collection Name

Total Knee Replacement Performance Measurement Set

Submitter

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society

Developer

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society

Funding Source(s)

Unspecified

Composition of the Group that Developed the Measure

Total Knee Replacement Work Group Members: David Mauerhan, MD (Co-chair); Jay Lieberman, MD (Co-chair)

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: Nelson SooHoo, MD

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: James Keeney, MD; Michael Parks, MD

The Knee Society: Jess Lonner, MD; Michael Mont, MD

American Physical Therapy Association: Sara Piva, PT, PhD

Pacific Business Group on Health: Kate Chenok, MBA

American Medical Association (AMA)-convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement® (PCPI™): Scott Endsley, MD; Samantha Tierney; Elvia Chavarria

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Staff: Robert Hall; Krista Stewart

Project Consultant: Rebecca Kresowik

Financial Disclosures/Other Potential Conflicts of Interest

None of the members of the Total Knee Replacement Work Group had any disqualifying material interests under the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) Conflict of Interest Policy. The following is a summary of non-disqualifying interests disclosed on Work Group members' Material Interest Disclosure Statements. Completed Material Interest Disclosure Statements are available upon request.

Work Group Members Disclosures

David Mauerhan, MD (Co-chair)

  • Payment for Consulting Services – Biomet, Inc.

Jay Lieberman, MD (Co-chair)

  • Payment for Consulting Services – De Puy, Inc.

Nelson SooHoo, MD

  • None

James Keeney, MD

  • Officer - Society of Military Orthopedic Surgeons and Mid-America Orthopaedic Association

Michael Parks, MD

  • Stock Ownership – Zimmer, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, P&G, United Health
  • Payment for Consulting Services – Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
  • Research Support – Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
  • Director – American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons and New York State Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Jess Lonner, MD

  • Stock Ownership – Mako Surgical
  • Research Support – Zimmer, Mako Surgical
  • Speaking Honoraria – Zimmer, Mako Surgical
  • Royalties – Zimmer
  • Service on Speaker's Bureau – Zimmer, Mako Surgical
  • Payment for Consulting Services – Zimmer
  • Scientific Advisory Board – Healthpoint Capital, C D Diagnostics
  • Service on Editorial Board for Several Peer Reviewed Journals

Michael Mont, MD

  • Research – NIH, Stryker, Tissue Gene, Wright Medical
  • Royalties – Stryker
  • Payment for Consulting Services – Stryker, Tissue Gene, Joint Active Systems, Johnson and Johnson, Salient Surgical

Scott Endsley, MD

  • None

Sara Piva, PT, PhD

  • None

Kate Chenok, MBA

  • None

Measure Initiative(s)

Physician Quality Reporting System

Adaptation

This measure was not adapted from another source.

Date of Most Current Version in NQMC

2015 Jan

Measure Maintenance

Unspecified

Date of Next Anticipated Revision

Unspecified

Measure Status

This is the current release of the measure.

The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in October 2015.

Source(s)

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Total knee replacement performance measurement set. Rosemont (IL): American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; 2015. 29 p. [25 references]

Measure Availability

Source available from the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) Web site External Web Site Policy.

For more information, contact AAHKS at 6300 N. River Road, Suite 615, Rosemont, IL 60018; Phone: 847-698-1200; Fax: 847-698-0704; Web site: www.aahks.org External Web Site Policy.

NQMC Status

This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on May 29, 2014. The information was verified by the measure developer on July 21, 2014.

The information was reaffirmed by the measure developer on October 20, 2015.

Copyright Statement

This NQMC summary is based on the original measure, which is subject to the measure developer's copyright restrictions.

© 2012 American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. All rights reserved.

These performance measures are not clinical guidelines. They do not establish a standard of medical care and have not been tested for all potential applications. These Measures and specifications are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. AAHKS shall not be responsible for any use of these performance measures.

Limited propriety coding is contained in the Measure specifications for convenience. Users of the propriety code sets should obtain all necessary licenses from the owners of these code sets. AAHKS disclaims all liability for use or accuracy of any Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) or other coding contained in the specifications.

The Measures are subject to review and may be revised at any time by AAHKS. The Measures may not be altered without the prior written approval of AAHKS. Users of the Measures shall not have the right to alter, enhance, or otherwise modify the Measures.

CPT® contained in the Measure specifications is copyright 2004-2011 American Medical Association.

NQMC Disclaimer

The National Quality Measures Clearinghouse™ (NQMC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the measures represented on this site.

All measures summarized by NQMC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public and private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, individuals, and similar entities.

Measures represented on the NQMC Web site are submitted by measure developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NQMC Inclusion Criteria.

NQMC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or its reliability and/or validity of the quality measures and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of measures represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NQMC, AHRQ, or its contractor, ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of measures in NQMC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding measure content are directed to contact the measure developer.